| To: | alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:22:50 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxx, manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1032383727.20463.155.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> |
| References: | <1032381789.20498.151.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020918.134630.127509858.davem@redhat.com> <1032383727.20463.155.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 18 Sep 2002 22:15:27 +0100 It doesnt matter what XFree86 is doing. Thats just to load the PCI bus and jam it up to prove the point. It'll change your inb timing Understood. Maybe a more accurate wording would be "a fixed minimum timing". |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Eric W. Biederman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |