netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pfeather@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3D86645F.5030401@mandrakesoft.com>
References: <12116.1032216780@redhat.com> <12293.1032217399@redhat.com> <3D86645F.5030401@mandrakesoft.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:08:15 -0400
   
   I was rather disappointed when file->file sendfile was [purposefully?] 
   broken in 2.5.x...

What change made this happen?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik
Next by Date:  Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik
Previous by Thread:  Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik
Next by Thread:  Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]