| To: | borisp@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:34:47 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3D80DF4F.5B218F19@mc.com> |
| References: | <3D80DF4F.5B218F19@mc.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Bonding does not help with single stream performance. You have to have multiple apps generating multiple streams of data before you'll realize any improvement. Therefore netpipe is a bad test for what you're doing. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Make $20,000 with PayPal! Fast, reliable,FREE!!!, Your Friend |
| Previous by Thread: | bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Boris Protopopov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Chris Friesen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |