| To: | gh@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:01:04 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Martin.Bligh@xxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, niv@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E17nOQ8-0003a8-00@w-gerrit2> |
| References: | <20020906.114815.127906065.davem@redhat.com> <E17nOQ8-0003a8-00@w-gerrit2> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:05:27 -0700 So, any comments I made which might have implied that Tux/Tux2 made things worse have no substantiated data to prove that and it is quite possible that there is no such problem. Also, this was run nearly a year ago and the state of Tux/Tux2 might have been a bit different at the time. Thanks for clearing things up. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |