| To: | niv@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 05 Sep 2002 20:58:42 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1031283490.3d7823228d9ed@imap.linux.ibm.com> |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0209052129580.21731-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> <1031283490.3d7823228d9ed@imap.linux.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:38:10 -0700 most recent (dont know how far back) versions of netstat display /proc/net/snmp and /proc/net/netstat (with the Linux TCP MIB), so netstat -s should show you most of whats interesting. Or were you referring to something else? ifconfig -a and netstat -rn would also be nice to have.. TSO gets turned off during retransmits/SACK and the card does not do retransmits. Can we move on in this conversation now? :-) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |