| To: | glee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] connect() return value. |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:23:37 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020815110210.GA15218@anakin.wychk.org> |
| References: | <20020815032543.GA3083@gandalf.chinesecodefoo.org> <20020814.201514.30457132.davem@redhat.com> <20020815110210.GA15218@anakin.wychk.org> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Geoffrey Lee <glee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 21:02:10 +1000 On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:15:14PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > How extensive are your notes on poll() behavior on TCP > sockets? :-) Hmm, in which regard? Is there something specific that you are searching for? :-) POLLHUP in particular. I remember we verified that our behavior matched Solaris but no checks were performed against others. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Resend: SIOCGIFBRDADDR?, Kevin Dwyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., Geoffrey Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., Geoffrey Lee |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., Geoffrey Lee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |