| To: | glee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Geoffrey Lee) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] connect() return value. |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:25:39 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx (Dave Miller), netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020814045755.GB32315@anakin.wychk.org> from "Geoffrey Lee" at Aug 14, 2 02:57:55 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > So, in the near future, we can expect Linux to not return 0 for > non-blocking connects (i.e. the change you mentioned)? I wanted, but I changed my opinion about this. It is pretty strange to mimic behavior of solaris/tru64 and Co, which is really stinking. So, despite of our current behavior is not perfect and even not quite self-consistent, it is the best one. Well, and it does not contradict to sus/posix. So, connect() remains restartable, and it will return 0 on success instead of EISCONN crap. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., glee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., Geoffrey Lee |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., glee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |