| To: | becker@xxxxxxxxx (Donald Becker) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19 |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:13:21 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208140812570.3936-100000@beohost.scyld.com> from "Donald Becker" at Aug 14, 2 08:15:47 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > I'm not certain what you mean by this: there are many NIC chips that have > alignment requirements similar to the Tulip design. Comparing to _his_ ones. > Note that the Tulip is no more likely than other cards to trigger > motherboard PCI implementation bugs. Donald, it was brain attack. When speaking about alignment we have already switched to investigation of our checksumming routines. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, Donald Becker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, Donald Becker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |