| To: | bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx (Benjamin LaHaise) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:27:56 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020813143120.C12730@redhat.com> from "Benjamin LaHaise" at Aug 13, 2 02:31:20 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Ah, I see. Care for a patch to remove it altogether then? Well, someone wrote it for some purpose. :-) > As for the > bug, does anyone else see a place where nr_frags can be set without > initializing a page pointer? No. When does this happen? > Otherwise it looks like a random memory corruption... what fun. Well, even if this is corruption, it is unlikely to be random. This maybe write beyond end of an skb, corrupting skb_shared_info. At least, we had such place in netfilter fixed some time ago. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise |
| Next by Thread: | Serious weirdness w/ cbq and everything else, CIT/FOONET Admin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |