netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags

from [kuznet] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx (Benjamin LaHaise)
Subject: Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags
From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 01:07:33 +0400 (MSD)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020809161439.E10640@redhat.com> from "Benjamin LaHaise" at Aug 11, 2 02:45:07 am
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Hello!

> that comes from an uninitialized fragment entry in an skb, and this problem 
> looks like a possible causes.

This function is not used, by the way.

Alexey
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., kuznet
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., Geoffrey Lee
Previous by Thread:  [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise
Next by Thread:  Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]