| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TODO list before feature freeze |
| From: | Patrick Schaaf <bof@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:06:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | Patrick Schaaf <bof@xxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0207300818480.15727-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>; from hadi@cyberus.ca on Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:29:49AM -0400 |
| References: | <20020730142758.A492@oknodo.bof.de> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0207300818480.15727-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
> Hashing is an issue, no doubt but i dont think it is the main issue.
I fully agree. I mention this all the time.
> Did you start chasing hashing because you saw some large numbers
> in profiles?
No. I looked at the hash function and bucket sizes, because I now have
machines in the field running conntrack, and I wanted to understand
how I should chose an appropriate size. So I took real world conntrack
snapshots on those machines, and analysed. I learned all there is to
learn about the question, and present the results for others to use
like they see fit. End of story.
Again, I have no performance trouble with conntracking on any of my
production systems.
best regards
Patrick
--
everything is under control.
(Hardware)
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.18 userspace seeing UDP packets with bad checksum?, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TODO list before feature freeze, Martin Josefsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TODO list before feature freeze, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TODO list before feature freeze, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |