| To: | Patrick Schaaf <bof@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TODO list before feature freeze |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:31:16 +0200 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020729182659.D570@oknodo.bof.de> |
| References: | <20020729131239.A5183@wotan.suse.de> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0207290719580.12604-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> <20020729182659.D570@oknodo.bof.de> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> Regarding the hashing schemes, please see discussions on netfilter-devel > over the last weeks: > > http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2002-July/thread.html > > and a small presentation of various bucket sizes / hash functions > for some real world scenarios: http://bei.bof.de/ex6/ > This presentation, a bit terse on comments, links to a tarball > which allows you to recreate the same presentation for any > dump of /proc/net/ip_conntrack, varying bucket counts and > hash functions. Have you done any profiling of real workloads to see where the actual overhead comes from? -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: TODO list before feature freeze, Patrick Schaaf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TODO list before feature freeze, Patrick Schaaf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TODO list before feature freeze, Patrick Schaaf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TODO list before feature freeze, Patrick Schaaf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |