netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Status of implementations

To: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Status of implementations
From: Antonio Miguel Trindade <trindade@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:22:25 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200207251505.RAA06891@minnie.xos.nl>
References: <200207251505.RAA06891@minnie.xos.nl>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.4.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 25 July 2002 16:05, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >    What I would like know is, if possible, what is the status of several
> > IPv6 implementations. I thought of using SuSE, as it already boasts a
> > good Linux implementation, but I would like to hear from you.
>
> Better don't start political discussions about "good Linux implementations"
> (i.e., flame wars about distributions ;-)), but you might want to look at
> this excellent page for IPv6 support:
>

   It isn't my intention either... What I mean by "good implementations" is 
"the closest possible to the specifications"...

>    http://www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/status/IPv6+Linux-status.html
>

   Thank you very much.

> Have fun,

   I'll try... ;-)

- -- 
- ----------------------------------------------------------
         Antonio Miguel Ferreira Marques Trindade
                trindade@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
            Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia
                 Universidade de Coimbra
                        PORTUGAL
- ----------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9QBexBCmuJFX6u2cRAvG8AKCWfhFeyV8EkBg5Xnqi+els/FRHQQCgxYZW
wBEHe+LRZaePgT/w4Z40oqY=
=RJT+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>