| To: | george@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Network oops |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:17:20 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, andrew.r.cress@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3D133538.60B6810C@mvista.com> |
| References: | <3D120EAE.5A0D365E@mvista.com> <20020620.173805.55219901.davem@redhat.com> <3D133538.60B6810C@mvista.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:16:24 -0700 [ BTW please start using newlines in your emails, instead of 1,000 character monstrosities lacking them. Thanks ] On the other hand, I prefer to think of the linux community as a group of folks working on making one of the best OSs on the planet even better. Right, and I don't think CONFIG_PREEMPT makes the planet better. In fact, now that you mention it, I think CONFIG_PREEMPT is a pile of crap. > It requires a full audit of the networking in the new preemption > environment. Any pointers on what to look for would be welcome. And you go right back to asking me to do the work for you. What is wrong with you? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Network oops, george anzinger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Network oops, george anzinger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Network oops, george anzinger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Network oops, george anzinger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |