| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NAPI for eepro100 |
| From: | Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:57:53 +0400 |
| Cc: | fxzhang@xxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020612.160532.134201977.davem@redhat.com>; from "David S. Miller" on Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 04:05:32PM |
| References: | <3D0740ED.2060907@ict.ac.cn> <3D07D270.5060902@mandrakesoft.com> <20020612.160532.134201977.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 04:05:32PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:00:00 -0400
>
> for the 'mips' patch, it looks
> like the arch maintainer(s) need to fix the PCI DMA support...
>
> No, it's worse than that.
>
> See how non-consistent memory is used by the eepro100 driver
> for descriptor bits? The skb->tail bits?
>
> That is very problematic.
What's the problem?
If it isn't allowed to do, then what is the meaning of PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
mappings?
Andrey
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Lincoln Dale |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: NAPI for eepro100, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NAPI for eepro100, Donald Becker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NAPI for eepro100, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |