| To: | george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment() |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 May 2002 02:39:19 +0200 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3CE99434.20E7479C@mvista.com> |
| References: | <200205210011.EAA04286@sex.inr.ac.ru> <3CE99434.20E7479C@mvista.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:26:29AM +0200, george anzinger wrote: > kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > > It's unfortunately the truth. Even in_interrupt() is buggy current > > > on SMP preemptive. > > > > And why folks working on preemtive kernel do not repair this? > > To all that I remember it is well known issue. > > > Ah, but we have. in_interrupt() was fixed about a month > ago. I think Robert got it into all the patches. Whats > more, it is a bit faster too :) It's not fixed in 2.5.15/16. I don't know about your patches. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |