| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment() |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 May 2002 02:20:07 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, george@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200205210011.EAA04286@sex.inr.ac.ru> |
| References: | <20020521015407.A1296@wotan.suse.de> <200205210011.EAA04286@sex.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 04:11:00AM +0400, A.N.Kuznetsov wrote: > Hello! > > > It's unfortunately the truth. Even in_interrupt() is buggy current > > on SMP preemptive. > > And why folks working on preemtive kernel do not repair this? > To all that I remember it is well known issue. It is fixed on x86-64 @) if [ "$CONFIG_SMP" = "n" ]; then bool 'Preemptible Kernel' CONFIG_PREEMPT fi -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), george anzinger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), george anzinger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |