| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug? |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:22:40 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3C6A207F.3590B8ED@mandrakesoft.com> |
| References: | <3C6A0817.B50EFC74@mandrakesoft.com> <20020212.223929.66060180.davem@redhat.com> <3C6A0F32.DE282B67@mandrakesoft.com> <20020212.234325.59465194.davem@redhat.com> <3C6A1EF5.1BF97B99@mandrakesoft.com> <20020213090932.A7398@wotan.suse.de> <3C6A207F.3590B8ED@mandrakesoft.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:14:55AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:08:21AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Can we at least return -EOPNOTSUPPORTED, please? Otherwise you have the > > > current situation: random binaries breaking when you run them under > > > 2.2.x versus 2.4.x. > > > > 2.2 behaved the same way. Only 2.0 did differently. > > Sorry, that is not what I see with my own testing, and bug reports. > > Under 2.2, IFF_PROMISC flag appears and disappears correctly in > /sbin/ifconfig. Under 2.4, it does not. I did not test 2.0. Did you use the same tcpdump/libpcap in 2.2 and 2.4 ? -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |