| To: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:39:29 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | ak@xxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3C6A0817.B50EFC74@mandrakesoft.com> |
| References: | <20020212.205809.70219775.davem@redhat.com> <20020213071933.A22699@wotan.suse.de> <3C6A0817.B50EFC74@mandrakesoft.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 01:30:47 -0500 Please help me understand the compatibility issues that prevent this, given what I've just described... What if you have a "promisc" count of 4, and SIOCSIFFLAGS asks to turn IFF_PROMISC off? There is no logical way to perform such an operation. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IFF_PROMISC bug?, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |