netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: your mail

To: rminnich@xxxxxxxx (Ronald G Minnich)
Subject: Re: your mail
From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 22:21:23 +0300 (MSK)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxx, hendriks@xxxxxxxx, matt@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202041347270.4327-100000@snaresland.acl.lanl.gov> from "Ronald G Minnich" at Feb 4, 2 02:05:04 pm
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hello!

> To recap, nivedita proposed a TCP_DELACK sockopt to allow users to
> completely disabled delayed acks. Alexey thought this a bad idea. We're
> not convinced it is a bad idea, and it has a lot of attraction for us.
...
> Alexey's comments are plain, and my comments in <<<>>>

I did not write the phrases in <<<>>>. :-)

Yes, I really insist: disabling delayed ACKs is _never_ good.
Such curcumstances just do not exist in the nature.

I do not understand what happens in your case, you did not provide
tcpdumps. Though I even can suspect that your problem is due to
too frequent acking. :-)

Alexey

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>