netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: netdev.stats change suggestion

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: netdev.stats change suggestion
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:29:04 -0800
Cc: Dmitrii Tisnek <dima@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3C4FEEE6.6E44E6EE@mandrakesoft.com>
References: <Pine.OSF.4.30.0201231450280.15676-100000@kosh.hut.fi> <20020124112023.GA31956@tapu.f00f.org> <3C4FEEE6.6E44E6EE@mandrakesoft.com>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.26i
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:24:22AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:

    We should make them 64-bit because related SNMP MIBs use 64-bits.

(1) Do we need atomic add/sub for any of these?  If so, making them
    64-bit sucks terribly.

(2) What can't snmpd detect and deal with wrap?  I know for certain
    SNMP operations things are supposed to be strictly increasing for
    the life-time the machine is up --- but is this really a big deal?
    SNMP albeit a very useful thing and times, is also horribly crude
    and has some terrible limitations, it alone doesn't seem like a
    good reason to me.


Comments?

  --cw


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>