| To: | ja@xxxxxx (Julian Anastasov) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: fib/netdev cleanup |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:36:42 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112182211470.22581-100000@l> from "Julian Anastasov" at Dec 18, 1 10:33:13 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up <--- enable IP It is the only official way to create addressless IP interfaces. > ops, the last command deleted the route to 192.168.0.2 And this is the only official way to destroy an IP interface. > in 2.2 it leaks link route to 10.0.0.0/24 Well, it is bug. Old kenele must have some bugs eventually. :-) > The question is whether we should disable IP when the > last address is deleted. MUST. > Under "disable IP" you mean Under disable I means disable. No IP on this interface. No input, no output, no references, full shutdown. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fib/netdev cleanup, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][RFC 2] cleaning up struct sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: fib/netdev cleanup, Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: fib/netdev cleanup, Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |