| To: | rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rusty Russell) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: network interface names ethX and renaming interfaces |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:11:56 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E16FOkX-0001pY-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au> from "Rusty Russell" at Dec 16, 1 04:45:00 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > What an interesting corner case. I assume that there's a good > (speed?) reason why init_etherdev doesn't use dev_alloc_name() or > equiv. It was simply heavily broken. Well, if all was right in x.y, there were no reasons to work n kernel x.y+1. Right? :-) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fib/netdev cleanup, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: fib/netdev cleanup, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: network interface names ethX and renaming interfaces, Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: network interface names ethX and renaming interfaces, Hein Roehrig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |