| To: | acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][RFC 2] cleaning up struct sock |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:08:09 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | SteveW@xxxxxxx, jschlst@xxxxxxxxx, ncorbic@xxxxxxxxxxx, eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dag@xxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20011218185200.A1211@conectiva.com.br> |
| References: | <20011218033552.B910@conectiva.com.br> <20011217.225134.91313099.davem@redhat.com> <20011218185200.A1211@conectiva.com.br> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 18:52:00 -0200 Em Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:51:34PM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu: > Which brings me to... > > Please let me know if this is something acceptable for 2.5. > > What kind of before/after effect do you see in lat_tcp/lat_connect > (from lmbench) runs? Improvements on the lat_connect case? :) Great. I have no fundamental problems with your changes. Now, when/if we move the hash-chain/identity members into the IPv4 struct (there are some issues with this wrt. ipv6 btw) I will be interested in seeing the same tests done :-) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: fib/netdev cleanup, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: network interface names ethX and renaming interfaces, Neale Banks |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][RFC 2] cleaning up struct sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][RFC 2] cleaning up struct sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |