| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kfree_skb |
| From: | Chuck Winters <cwinters@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:43:16 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20011210210842.A896@conectiva.com.br>; from acme@conectiva.com.br on Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:08:42PM -0200 |
| Mail-followup-to: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20011210133840.A1534@atl.lmco.com> <20011210210842.A896@conectiva.com.br> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:08:42PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:38:40PM -0500, Chuck Winters escreveu: > > Can bad things happen in 2.2 if you kfree_skb more than once? > > not if it matches the number of skb_get on it (or other operations that > bump the skb refcount, dunno if it exists in 2.2, I'm looking at 2.4, that > bumps the refcount at least in skb_recv_datagram) 8) > > - Arnaldo Thanks |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | One IP address configured on two interfaces, Mohammad Akram |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] cleaning up struct sock, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kfree_skb, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | How to set the free-buffer-space for which select set a socket writable., Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |