Re: [RFC] cleaning up struct sock

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Em Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 09:52:19AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> If that is the case then we could keep some of the performance critical
> protocols in the union and leave the other ones, that already were
> allocating two objects, using the sk->protinfo.generic (aka destruct_hook),
> but there are other possibilities, like you mention.
> 
> Ok, the goal of not having anything specific to a protocol in sock.h would
> not be achieved, but things more cleaner than today.
                             ^
                          would

> That was one of the reasons for me not to have left af_inet with the

above I mean: (without the "not")

 "That was one of the reasons for me to have left af_inet with the"
                                   
> #ifdefs in protinfo in this patch (i.e. for performance critical, most of
> the time enabled anyway protocols, leave it as is in protinfo).

sorry...