| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented |
| From: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:53:50 +0100 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0112091642480.6079-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>; from hadi@cyberus.ca on Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 04:45:01PM -0500 |
| Mail-followup-to: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <200112091814.VAA00499@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0112091642480.6079-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 04:45:01PM -0500, jamal wrote: > > > Cant think of a straight way to do this .... Alexey would know, > > > > SO_PRIORITY. Or I did not follow you? > > So priority limits the size of skb->priority to be from 0..6; this wont > work with that check in cbq. No, only IP_TOS does so. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services Trilab The Technology People Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available - 'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet |
| Previous by Date: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |