| To: | lars.spam@xxxxxxxxxx (Lars Brinkhoff) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: af_packet bug? |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:52:08 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <85lmht1sri.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> from "Lars Brinkhoff" at Oct 30, 1 08:39:13 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Does that sound like a plausible solution? No. It looks like you use packet socket for a purpose where it cannot be useful at all. This cannot work. I guess you want ethertap. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: af_packet bug?, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: af_packet bug?, Michael Richardson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: af_packet bug?, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: af_packet bug?, Michael Richardson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |