| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 |
| From: | Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Oct 2001 15:03:55 -0400 |
| Cc: | mingo@xxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200110031653.UAA13938@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 08:53:58PM +0400 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110031702280.7221-100000@localhost.localdomain> <200110031653.UAA13938@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 08:53:58PM +0400, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Citing my old explanation:
>
> >"Polling" is not a real polling in fact, it just accepts irqs as
> >events waking rx softirq with blocking subsequent irqs.
> >Actual receive happens at softirq.
> >
> >Seems, this approach solves the worst half of livelock problem completely:
> >irqs are throttled and tuned to load automatically.
> >Well, and drivers become cleaner.
Well, this sounds like a 2.5 patch. When do we get to merge it?
-ben
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Ingo Molnar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Simon Kirby |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |