| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19 |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:40:02 +0200 |
| Cc: | tao@xxxxxxxxxx, matthias.andree@xxxxxx, alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wietse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200109101936.XAA00707@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:36:20PM +0200 |
| References: | <20010910100537.W26627@khan.acc.umu.se> <200109101936.XAA00707@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:36:20PM +0200, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > And I see no reasons to refuse this: it evidently improves the things > almost without efforts. Doubtful. > No matter that this imporvement is not so useful, > as it would happen if I guessed this way from the very beginning. That's a polite way to express it. > So that applications will have to worry about compatibility with older > kernels in any case. Just hope then that no ifconfig or other binary has a two on the stack when calling this. -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How to determine source ip address, Christopher Friesen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19, Matthias Andree |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |