| To: | chuckw@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sk_buff question |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Aug 2001 00:52:48 -0300 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010823114421.A4454@ieee.org>; from chuckw@ieee.org on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:44:21AM -0400 |
| References: | <20010823114421.A4454@ieee.org> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.17i |
Em Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:44:21AM -0400, chuckw@xxxxxxxx escreveu: > Hello again, > I was wondering if anyone knew why in sk_buff the next and prev > pointers _need_ to be first? look at sk_buff_head definition and at functions using sk_buff_head, the casts, etc, and you'll know 8) - Arnaldo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | sk_buff question, chuckw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | incorporating bonding code changes into the kernel, Janice Girouard |
| Previous by Thread: | sk_buff question, chuckw |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sk_buff question, chuckw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |