| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | sk_buff question |
| From: | chuckw@xxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:44:21 -0400 |
| Mail-followup-to: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hello again,
I was wondering if anyone knew why in sk_buff the next and prev
pointers _need_ to be first?
Thanks,
Chuck
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Simple bug fix in tcp_getsockopt(): TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT, Sridhar Samudrala |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sk_buff question, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Simple bug fix in tcp_getsockopt(): TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT, Sridhar Samudrala |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sk_buff question, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |