| To: | chuckw@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Questions about the tcp code in 2.4.9 |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:39:44 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010820131924.A12155@ieee.org>; from chuckw@ieee.org on Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:19:24PM +0200 |
| References: | <20010820131924.A12155@ieee.org> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:19:24PM +0200, chuckw@xxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello All, > I have 2 questions. They may seem stupid, but the guys over at > kernelnewbies said > you guys would know the answers to these. > 1) on line 1054 of tcp.c it seems that the sock buffer is being added > to the > front of the write queue. > If my observation is correct ? why : what is > happening The tcp write queue is a ring and prev of the is head is the back. > > 2) when an iovec is written to the sock buffer, it looks like the > whole iovec > is written into the same sock buffer. Is that correct? Not necessarily. It can be split over multiple skbs when needed. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Questions about the tcp code in 2.4.9, chuckw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Simple Packet Signing, bert hubert |
| Previous by Thread: | Questions about the tcp code in 2.4.9, chuckw |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Questions about the tcp code in 2.4.9, chuckw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |