| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect?? |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:11:04 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B77F5B8.B43EA7CD@candelatech.com>; from greearb@candelatech.com on Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:43:52AM -0700 |
| References: | <3B7748B0.C897121A@candelatech.com> <20010813.071436.74751236.davem@redhat.com> <3B77F5B8.B43EA7CD@candelatech.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:43:52AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > Also, from doing a google search on setsockopt and IP_TOS, I was able > to find exactly zero pieces of source code that do this, so I may be > the first one to every try it :) A search for IP_TOS on http://www.codecatalog.com will give you 54hits, and it is missing a lot of stuff. For example sshd has a long standing bug where it enables high priority TOS when $DISPLAY is set, which causes rsync over ssh to kill your lines badly when run from X. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect??, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect??, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect??, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect??, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |