| To: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing |
| From: | Mark Baker <mark@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:50:51 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108022038280.4508-100000@netcore.fi>; from pekkas@netcore.fi on Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 08:41:57PM +0300 |
| Mail-followup-to: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20010802133839.C24305@bacchus.dhis.org> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108022038280.4508-100000@netcore.fi> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 08:41:57PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > As there are no huge technical or address allocational reasons why ISP's > could not give at least /64, those ISP's that do get more popular and ones > dealing /128's do not, and disappear from IPv6 market. There are, however, technical reasons why ISPs might want to use dynamic IPs (if they have lots of dial-up hardware in different locations, routing issues make static IP difficult), so although their customers would get a /64, it might be a different one every time they dial up. In that situation, since I wouldn't want addresses on my local network to keep changing, I would want to use NAT to translate the address block assigned by the ISP onto some site local address space. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: ERRATA Re: [PATCH] fix for netfilter/nat/pppoe crashes (hopefully), kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Ethan Blanton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Ethan Blanton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |