| To: | cw@xxxxxxxx (Chris Wedgwood) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2001 23:37:06 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | therapy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010801073441.E8228@weta.f00f.org> from "Chris Wedgwood" at Aug 1, 1 07:34:41 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > ICMP echo/reply is a useful diagnostic tool --- but on the internet as > we have it today, its limitations need to be understood by the user :) But what do you propose eventually? :-) To bind all of them together? Then kernel must be shipped out without rate-limiting enabled by default, that's problem. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ping bug, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |