| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2001 23:06:01 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | therapy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107312201370.20518-100000@netcore.fi> from "Pekka Savola" at Jul 31, 1 10:03:27 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Having two pools, one for error and the other for informational message I am "people" too. And I do not expect that echos are limited at all. :-) And assume that default configuration is no limit. Hence, adding it to a common structure is mistake. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |