| To: | laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Harald Welte) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: oops/bug in tcp, SACK doesn't work? |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Jul 2001 20:53:36 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010728004447.I1240@obroa-skai.gnumonks.org> from "Harald Welte" at Jul 28, 1 11:15:01 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Please note that the netfilter nat protocol helpers for ftp (and irc as well > as > other protocols in patch-o-matic) delete the SACKPERM option on-the-fly > from all packets. Then Marty would not see any sacks at all. > It has to, as you run in neverending complications as soon as the nat helper > has to alter the tcp sequence numbers, etc. It is not a valid justification. It is difficult to rewrite sequence numbers. As soon as nat does this, rewriting sacks is easy. Even not easy, trivial. Sad and not expected behaviour. I used to ridicule commercial firewall vendors, sometimes doing shit of this kind without any clear reasons. :-) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TCP 4way handshake, Alexey Kuznetsov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: conflicting alignment requirements, Jacob Avraham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: oops/bug in tcp, SACK doesn't work?, Harald Welte |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: oops/bug in tcp, SACK doesn't work?, Harald Welte |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |