| To: | Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: skb_pull, etc. panics. |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:22:17 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010613115848.A19894@grendel.conscoop.ottawa.on.ca>; from Richard Guy Briggs on Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:58:48PM +0200 |
| References: | <20010606141145.L31244@grendel.conscoop.ottawa.on.ca> <20010613032126.B5323@fred.local> <20010613115848.A19894@grendel.conscoop.ottawa.on.ca> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:58:48PM +0200, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > ...so checking for it is considered debugging code and thus, overhead > that need not be in a production system? In theory yes. It is a good sanity check to stop early when things go wrong though so it is kept. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Donald Becker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: skb_pull, etc. panics., Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: skb_pull, etc. panics., Richard Guy Briggs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |