[Just back from vacation, sorry for late answer]
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:06:12PM +0200, Peter Bieringer wrote:
> --On Sunday, June 03, 2001 01:29:42 PM +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:03:24AM +0200, Peter Bieringer wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> are there any plans to implement "ipv6_local_port_range" in the
> >> future like on IPv4?
> >
> > The IPv4 sysctl is shared between IPv4 and IPv6, because v4 and v6
> > share a common port space.
> Thanks for reply.
>
> Two more questions:
>
> 1) exists there any documentation beside the source code itself which
> "/proc/sys/net/ipv4" values will be also used for IPv6?
No, you have to do RTFS currently.
>
> 2) are there any plans for 2.5 or later to split off common used proc
> switches to another directory like "/proc/sys/net/ip"? There was a
> thread sometimes ago relating 'howto make IPv4 as module' which can
> be take advantage of such split off (I'm thinking about IPv6 only
> clients with Linux network stack)...
I know of no such plans.
-Andi
|