netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: IPv6+2.4.x: ipv6_local_port_range implementation plans + netfilter6

from [Andi Kleen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv6+2.4.x: ipv6_local_port_range implementation plans + netfilter6
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 13:29:42 +0200
Cc: Maillist netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Maillist linux-ipv6 <linux-ipv6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Maillist USAGI-users <usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <14800000.991472604@localhost>; from pb@bieringer.de on Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:03:24AM +0200
References: <14800000.991472604@localhost>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:03:24AM +0200, Peter Bieringer wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> are there any plans to implement "ipv6_local_port_range" in the 
> future like on IPv4?

The IPv4 sysctl is shared between IPv4 and IPv6, because v4 and v6 share
a common port space.


-Andi
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: why cannot bind to someipaddress:port when something else has *:port bound?, Stig Venaas
Next by Date:  Re: MII access (was [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only), Bogdan Costescu
Previous by Thread:  IPv6+2.4.x: ipv6_local_port_range implementation plans + netfilter6, Peter Bieringer
Next by Thread:  Re: IPv6+2.4.x: ipv6_local_port_range implementation plans + netfilter6, Peter Bieringer
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]