| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [benc@hawaga.org.uk: Linux "enable EUI-64 token format"] |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 02 May 2001 22:04:03 +0900 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105021516300.28386-100000@netcore.fi> |
| References: | <20010424181344.C805@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105021516300.28386-100000@netcore.fi> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105021516300.28386-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 2 May 2001 15:22:19 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > I also suggest that: > 1) EUI-64 will be the default > 2) Provider-based is an option, with a heavy warning (or removed > entirely, if feeling radical) I strongly suggest CONFIG_IPV6_EUI64 and CONFIG_IPV6_NO_PB should be enabled (Y) by default, and I suggest that provider-based address support should be removed. -- yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ioctl call for network device, Richard B. Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipv6 global forward overrides dev-specific forwarding, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [benc@hawaga.org.uk: Linux "enable EUI-64 token format"], Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [benc@hawaga.org.uk: Linux "enable EUI-64 token format"], Nathan Lutchansky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |