| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx (jamal) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ECN timeout support in Linux TCP? |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:51:04 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | bartoki@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0104291739320.28378-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> from "jamal" at Apr 29, 1 05:54:12 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > > Note also one more thing (which makes threshold twice worse and, probably, > > should be changed unlike above): ... > I dont think you passed this feedback to the RFC which is going > proposed standard next week ;-> But we dont wanna delay the publication, > one could argue it is a implementation detail which Linux ignores. I said: this should be changed. The issue is minor, no need to bother Sally about this. 8) Though... probably, it is an interesting issue for investigation: when sending ECE receiver could disable delaying ACKs. It is even good to accelerate delivery of congestion notification. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Patch] RS Count, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ECN timeout support in Linux TCP?, Bartok Istvan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ECN timeout support in Linux TCP?, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ECN timeout support in Linux TCP?, Bartok Istvan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |