| To: | jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jes Sorensen) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: initial acenic ZC cleanup |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Mar 2001 23:05:34 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx (Dave Miller) |
| In-reply-to: | <d34rx3fzrm.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> from "Jes Sorensen" at Mar 9, 1 05:45:00 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > A little, it needs to be taught about the tuning parameters for the > AceNIC. Actually, rx and tx timeouts should be generic enough to exist in common structure. BTW by some strange reason ETHTOOL_SSET does not allow to change these parameters. All of them except for TxBufRat are changable at run time. Jes, please, invent something to read verbose acenic statistics. It is too useful thing to be lost. 8) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: How to optimize routing performance, Martin Josefsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CHECKER] 120 potential dereference to invalid pointers errors forlinux 2.4.1, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ethtool and MII (was Re: initial acenic ZC cleanup), Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: initial acenic ZC cleanup, Mitchell Blank Jr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |