| To: | feldy@xxxxxxxx (Bob Felderman) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack] |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:45:13 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, feldy@xxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200103092224.OAA02690@frisbee.myri.com> from "Bob Felderman" at Mar 9, 1 02:24:32 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello!
> >>EIP; c0211bc4 <tcp_collapse+68/35c> <=====
Please, look how function tcp_collapse() looks in your tree.
(I am sorry, I do not know what exactly of patches do you use).
Does it contain the following?
for (skb = head; skb != tail; ) {
/* No new bits? It is possible on ofo queue. */
if (!before(start, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq)) {
struct sk_buff *next = skb->next;
__skb_unlink(skb, skb->list);
__kfree_skb(skb);
NET_INC_STATS_BH(TCPRcvCollapsed);
skb = next;
continue;
}
Alexey
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: handling of passive open -- syn and ack queues, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: weird implementation of ipip and sit tunnels, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Bob Felderman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |