| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack] |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:41:34 +0100 |
| Cc: | Bob Felderman <feldy@xxxxxxxx>, andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200103071848.VAA11377@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:48:25PM +0100 |
| References: | <200103071834.KAA13649@myri.com> <200103071848.VAA11377@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:48:25PM +0100, A.N.Kuznetsov wrote: > Hello! > > > is down quite a bit. > > Actually, the fact that eviction happens during your tests implies > that you should increase eviction threshold (ipfrag_high_thresh) > to value, when eviction never happens on LAN tests. It should happen > only if driver has lost some fragment... not good on LAN too. I think the current default size of the defrag buffer is far too low anyways. It should probably scale by numbers of interfaces also and better by bandwidth of the interface. Something like 1-2MB is much more reasonable with today's memory sizes. In my experience upping it can increase NFS performance a lot. -Andi -- This is like TV. I don't like TV. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] RFC: fix ethernet device initialization, Alan Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] RFC: fix ethernet device initialization, Jes Sorensen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |