| To: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack] |
| From: | Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Mar 2001 15:23:48 +0200 |
| Cc: | Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bob Felderman <feldy@xxxxxxxx>, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3AA60A35.F7C70C1@uow.edu.au> |
| References: | <200103061854.KAA03475@myri.com>, <200103061854.KAA03475@myri.com> <20010306211530.A14203@netppl.fi> <3AA60A35.F7C70C1@uow.edu.au> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:15:17PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > So you're saying that you can reproduce this crash with acenic? > > And that it's specific to jumbo frames, SMP and the /proc settings > which Bob is using? > > Bob is using a non-zerocopy kernel. What were you using? Here's the kdb report from 2.4.2-ac13 (or rather just stacktrace since I don't have a serial console setup :) ). Jumbo frames seem to be necessary to reproduce the problem (or at least they make it a lot more probable). I haven't tried a non-SMP kernel yet. Unable to handle kernel paging request at 0x5a5a5a72 __free_pages+0x3 skb_release_data+0x4e kfree_skbmem+0xe __kfree_skb+0xe3 ip_frag_destroy+0x73 ip_degrag+0x197 ip_local_deliver+0x20 ret_from_intr Looks like refcnt might not be increased properly somewhere, I'll try to hunt down the problem a bit more... -- Pekka Pietikainen |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |