netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.2.19pre16 TCP problems

To: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.2.19pre16 TCP problems
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 22:30:48 +0100
Cc: Statux <statux@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mario Lorenz <ml@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103041221430.2101-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:25:09PM -0300
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103032001070.1044-100000@circuit.moureaux.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103041221430.2101-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:25:09PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Date:   Sun, 4 Mar 2001 12:25:09 -0300 (BRST)
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Statux <statux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Mario Lorenz <ml@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: 2.2.19pre16 TCP problems 
> 
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Statux wrote:
> 
> > > If you need any more information, please email me. Please also CC: me as I
> > > am not subscribed to netdev.
> > 
> > How are you able to post to this list if you aren't subscribed (or is
> > this some "different" kind of mail list)? :)
> 
> IMHO mailing lists where only members can post are quite
> useless since they won't allow:
> - bug reports from non-subscribers
> - discussions cc'd to other lists
> - people sending stuff here because they were told to
> 
> Personally I never send useful information to subscriber-only
> lists because of these problems.

Dealing with spammers has worked well so far without highly restrictive
meassures as a subscriber-only policy and other abuse so far hasn't
been an issue at all, so why the fsck should we make live more complex
than absolutely necessary.

  Ralf (netdev-owner)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>