| To: | misiek@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: why autoconfiguration work's while shouldn't ? :) |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:10:57 +0900 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010222175523.A17144@ikar.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl> |
| References: | <20010222175523.A17144@ikar.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20010222175523.A17144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:55:23 +0100), Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <misiek@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > after a while when kernel tries autoconfiguration > (Feb 22 17:51:30 arm kernel: eth0: no IPv6 routers present) : > default dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > It adds few one default route which blows everything. > Can someone explain me why such route is added? : > Bug or I'm missing something? This is not a bug. If there're no routers, we must assume all destination are on-link. (RFC2461 5.2) -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515 1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | why autoconfiguration work's while shouldn't ? :), Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: why autoconfiguration work's while shouldn't ? :), Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
| Previous by Thread: | why autoconfiguration work's while shouldn't ? :), Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: why autoconfiguration work's while shouldn't ? :), Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |