| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: syncookie monsters ? |
| From: | Petru Paler <ppetru@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:18:02 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200102162015.XAA07506@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:15:45PM +0300 |
| References: | <20010216213948.F1900@ppetru.net> <200102162015.XAA07506@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.14i |
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:15:45PM +0300, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > So they have no use in defeating SYN flood attacks ? > > Sorry? They are useful for this, only for this. Otherwise, > why to enable them? 8) That's what I thought too; I didn't get your affirmation regarding signs of misconfiguration, though. -- Petru Paler, mailto:ppetru@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: syncookie monsters ?, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: syncookie monsters ?, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: syncookie monsters ?, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: syncookie monsters ?, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |